| |
Israel A. Smith—A True Prophet
By Pamela Price
Israel A. Smith was the fourth prophet of the
Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Brother
Israel, as he was affectionately called, was known as a kindly
and spiritual man who guided the Church as its prophet-president
from 1946 until 1958, when he was killed in an automobile accident.
Taking the reins of the Church government at the age of seventy,
he made an effort to maintain unity at a time when the fundamental-liberal
rift was fermenting. He was a Restorationist himself, and strongly
defended the Book of Mormon and the RLDS distinctives. He staunchly
defended Joseph Smith’s innocence in regard to polygamy,
and opposed the stance of the Utah Church. He published many articles
in the Saints’
Herald which were doctrinally important, and which
still provide timely counsel for the Church.
“Israel Alexander Smith, son of President
Joseph Smith III and Bertha Madison Smith, was born February 2,
1876, at Plano, Illinois. At the age of five his family moved
to Lamoni, Iowa.” He was baptized when ten years of age
(Saints’ Herald, June 23, 1958,
p.4).
After graduating from high school at Lamoni,
he attended Graceland College for two years. He married Nina Marie
Grenawalt on March 14, 1908. Nina “was graduated from the
music and elocution departments of Graceland College. She then
for a time continued her music and art work at Christian College,
Columbia, Missouri, and took a course in domestic science in Kansas
State College at Manhattan” (Saints’
Herald, November 13, 1950, p. 8).
Israel and Nina had two sons. Joseph Perrine
was born September 7. 1912, at Lamoni; and Don Carlos was born
March 4, 1916, in Independence, Missouri, where Israel and Nina
had moved. In the same month of March, Israel moved his family
into the house which had been the home of Israel’s father,
Joseph Smith III, at 1214 West Short Street in Independence, (Ibid).
Here Israel and Nina lived the rest of their lives.
The Saints’ Herald
recorded:
He was assistant or associate editor of the
Saints’ Herald, 1908–1913.
He served one term in the Iowa legislature, 1911–1913.
In 1912 he was admitted to the Iowa bar, and in 1913 to the
Missouri bar. Since January, 1929, he has been a member of the
Independence Bar Association and Missouri Bar Association.
He was ordained a high priest April 11, 1915,
at Lamoni, Iowa, by E. A. Smith and G. T. Griffiths. In 1920,
he was ordained a bishop and second counselor to the General
Church [presiding] bishop, serving until 1925. In October, 1922,
he was ordained a member of the Standing High Council and served
until 1942 (Saints’ Herald,
June 23, 1958, p. 4).
Israel Protested Supreme Directional Control
When President Frederick M. Smith brought forth his doctrine
of supreme directional control, his brother Israel protested.
Israel always favored democracy. As part of his opposition to
supreme directional control, he wrote an article for the Saints’
Herald of August 6, 1924, entitled, “Let the Facts
Be Known.” It was also printed as a tract, along with the
statement that it was “A Frank Statement by Bishop Israel
A. Smith Setting Out the History of the Present Controversy and
Telling Some Wholesome Truths.”
The Saints’ Herald for August
20, 1924, contained another article which was also printed later
as a tract. This article was signed by Presiding Bishop Benjamin
R. McGuire and both counselors, Bishops James F. Keir and Bishop
Israel A. Smith. Also signing were Bishops A. V. Karlstrom and
Roderick May, and Apostles John W. Rushton, and T. W. Williams.
The front cover of the tract stated:
Protest Against “Supreme Directional
Control”
Despite reports to the contrary, the council of Presidency,
Twelve, and Order of Bishops held last April was far from unanimous
in adopting the doctrine of “Supreme Directional Control."
A vigorous protest against this innovation, together with various
interesting documents, is herewith published.
As a result of Israel’s opposition to his brother’s
dictatorial ways, Israel was removed as bishop. The sad story
of what happened is faintly alluded to in the introduction to
Section 135 in the Doctrine and Covenants. It states:
A climax was reached in the General Conference of 1925. A
conflict of views between the First Presidency and the Presiding
Bishopric occurred. The Order of Bishops [which favored Frederick
M.] presented a motion to the Conference recommending the honorable
release from their positions of members of the Presiding Bishopric
[who opposed him]. The General Conference by motion deferred
action and approved an appeal to the Lord through the Prophet,
in fasting and prayer. In response to the plea of the church
the following revelation was received through President Frederick
M. Smith.... “It is wisdom that the brethren of the present
Presiding Bishopric be released from further responsibility
in that office... (DC 135:1).
By presenting a “revelation” which released the
fundamental members of the bishopric, President Frederick M. Smith
and his policy of “supreme directional control” succeeded
in winning the contest. The Church reeled as large numbers, some
in the high quorums, left the Church, because they did not believe
that God had given Section 135, which removed those from office
who were staunchly defending democracy in the Church and were
insisting upon following the laws as given in the Scriptures.
In spite of all the persecution, Israel Smith remained faithful
to the Church. He believed that God had a work for him to do,
and he wanted to be available when and if God called.
After Israel’s release from the bishopric, he and his
family suffered great poverty. He returned to practicing law,
but his business rarely prospered. Many poor Saints sought his
services free of charge, while others refrained from engaging
him as an attorney because of the stand he had taken against the
liberal changes in the Church.
Israel’s poverty was no secret. There are several written
references to his financial distress. On August 26, 1938, Israel
wrote a letter to his cousin, Inez Smith Davis’s husband,
Elder J. W. Davis (the original letter is owned by Richard and
Pamela Price). In that letter Israel wrote of “the hard
fight I am having for mere subsistence.” His sister Audentia
wrote, "There were 'lean years' with Israel for quite a long
time” (Saints’ Herald,
March 28, 1960, p.22). This poverty took place during a period
in which Israel was working for the Church, between 1930 and 1938.
He was secretary of the church from 1930 to 1940. In October
of 1938 he was associated with President Frederick M. Smith
as a counselor.... His ordination as a member of the Presidency
came as an authorization of the 1940 Conference....
President [Israel] Smith’s resolve upon coming into
the Presidency in 1946 [as the prophet] was to bring about unity
and close working relations between the quorums and departments
of the church. At this time he publicly announced that he had
been assured that he would be given ten years as Prophet, Seer
and Revelator of the church to bring about the purpose of God
(Saints' Herald, June 23, 1958, p.4).
A Mark of Greatness
One of Israel's marks of greatness was his kindness and concern
for others. When his father, Joseph Smith III and his stepmother,
Ada, died, Israel and Nina cared for his younger brothers—Wallace,
Richard, and Reginald as if they were their own sons.
"[He] Was for many years a companion and private secretary
for his father, assuming much personal care of that honored parent
during the four years of his blindness which preceded death, and
arranging from dictated memory and diaries of early years, the
manuscript for the personal memoirs of the late president"
(Mary Audentia Smith Anderson Ancestry and Posterity of Joseph
Smith and Emma Hale, p. 592). Israel could sympathize with his
blind father because Israel himself was almost totally blind in
one eye.
His sister, Mary Audentia Smith Anderson, wrote this account
of the accident which caused his blindness:
While still quite young, he recognized that the trend of his
life might be toward church work. He had some experiences that
made this possibility quite plain to him, as the following incident
reveals:
When Israel was a small boy, watching a threshing machine
at work, a tiny piece of filing flew into his eyeball. It was
extracted so unskillfully that his vision was permanently injured.
Later, at the outbreak of the Spanish-American War, in the full
exhilaration and enthusiasm that enveloped the young men of
our nation, he went to Des Moines to enlist as [a] volunteer
in the conflict. In the routine of processing these young men,
Israel was sent to an examining physician.
After a keen, searching look into the youth’s face,
the doctor said, “Close this eye; with the other read
that sign across the street.”
“I had to admit,” wrote Israel to me, “that
I couldn’t see the sign well enough to read it.... I...came
on home. I am deeply hurt and disappointed.... Could it be,
Audie," he wrote on, “that God has some work for
me to do for him—perhaps in another kind of warfare—the
struggle to save the souls of men instead of destroying their
bodies?” (Saints’ Herald,
March 28, 1960, page 21)
Israel did indeed do a work for the Lord in which he struggled
to save the souls of men. He worked hard to serve the Master,
and his accomplishments, if all were written, would fill books.
One of Israel’s deepest trials was the loss of his eldest
son, Joseph Perrine Smith, who died of pneumonia while attending
college. Audentia Anderson recorded the account of his death and
of Israel’s great faith in God during that dark hour. She
wrote:
Israel had to bear the heavy cross of bereavement, as have
most of us. He was a man whose crowning interests were well-woven
into his home life. He had proud dreams, no doubt, for his two
young sons. But alas, while in the height of strong young manhood
the oldest son, Joseph, was taken from earth life.
He had entered Missouri University in Columbia, but before
the year was out he was stricken with flu-pneumonia, which proved
fatal. His anxious parents were at his side continuously, those
last few days, their handclasps reassuring the lad of their
presence, their ears turned to hear his whispered words of love
for them, and his gratitude for all their tender care throughout
his short life.
Friends shared their vigils, and many were the fervent prayers
offered for their comfort and solace. One of those told me of
a touching incident that occurred just after the boy died. Israel
asked this brother to assist him to arise and stand. He did
so, and then they heard, from the stricken parent, a prayer
such as has seldom been expressed. Lifting his face toward his
God, and with the Holy Spirit filling the room, he prayed:
Our father, who art in Heaven; our son and brother has been
taken from us. It is thy will, and to that will we bow. He
was a son of the church, and therefore, by adoption, a son
of God and joint heir with Jesus Christ, and, as such, we
have the assurance that before thy judgment bar he will be
dealt with justly....
We have loved him dearly, and with loving and earnest hands
have clung to him; but we realize that hands equally as earnest
and loving have reached out to him from the other side of
the river of death to lead him into the paradise of God. His
was a bright and kindred spirit, and if Heaven is people with
spirits such as his, there is where I want to be.
And now, as his earthly father and as a priest of God, I
commit his soul back into the arms of the Maker who gave us
this splendid, lovable, and loving son. I place his hand in
Thine, 0 God. In the name of our Elder Brother, Jesus Christ,
Amen (Saints’ Herald, March
28, 1960, p.22).

|
|