About noon on the 3rd [of September 1842], Deputy-Sheriff Pitman [Pittman] with two other men came stealthily upon Joseph's residence and entered it while he was at dinner with his family. Before they reached the room where the Prophet was they met John Boynton and demanded that he should reveal Joseph's hiding place. While Boynton was making some evasive answer, the Prophet walked out through a rear door of the mansion [House], and entering a patch of tall corn in the garden, passed serenely through to the residence of Newel K. Whitney. In the meantime the officers proceeded to search the house. Emma demanded a sight of the warrant under which they were proceeding. Pitman said he had none authorizing him to search, but insisted upon going through the house. After Emma felt sure that Joseph had escaped, she permitted them to hunt through the building. Again that night two parties made another search of the residence but failed to discover him. (George Q. Cannon, The Life of Joseph Smith, the Prophet [Salt Lake City, Utah: Juvenile Instructor Office, 1888], 389–390) Cannon made an error when he stated that Joseph was living in the Mansion House when Deputy Pittman gained entrance into the home on September 3,1842, for Joseph and Emma lived in the Homestead on September 3. They did not move into the Mansion House until August 31, 1843, almost a year after Pittman's visit, for it had not yet been built. Therefore, it would have been impossible for Joseph, who resided in the Homestead, to have gone out the back door of the nonexistent Mansion House, into a cornfield, and into the Whitney home on that date. How Joseph Eluded Deputy PittmanTo better understand how the Martyr escaped from his would-be captors, it is necessary to understand that the Homestead had three doors in 1842, the same as it does now:
Deputy Pittman evidently entered the south room of the Homestead, where he was met and detained by John Boynton, a former apostle who was visiting Joseph at the time. Joseph was too wise to make an attempt to leave the house at noontime, for he knew he was not free to be upon the streets—even most of the Saints must not know of his whereabouts. The most logical thing for the Prophet to have done when he realized the deputy was a few feet away in the adjoining room, was to quietly pass through the west door and hide in the secret, underground compartment. One thing is certain—Joseph would not have gone out the west door of the Homestead, then to a cornfield, and on to Bishop Whitney's home four blocks away at the corner of Parley and Partridge Streets. (The Whitney home has been restored and now serves as the Nauvoo Land & Records Office.) It is important to correct George Q. Cannon's account of Joseph's eluding the officers on September 3, for in spite of Joseph's indisputable fight against polygamy during that summer, the LDS Church alleges that only five weeks earlier on July 27, 1842, the Prophet had married Sarah Ann Whitney, Bishop Whitney's seventeen-year-old daughter (Joseph F. Smith, Jr., Blood Atonement and the Origin of Plural Marriage [Press of Zion's Printing and Publishing Company: Independence, Jackson County, Mo., U. S. A.], 74). While the Prophet may have hidden at times in the Whitney home, it does not appear that he hid in the Whitney home on September 3, but was safely hidden at his own residence in his secret compartment. (The LDS Church's claim that Joseph was married plurally to Sarah Ann Whitney on July 27 will be discussed in a later chapter.) Joseph Insisted upon Staying with EmmaAlthough Joseph sometimes hid in the homes of others, the Lord showed him by vision and by a dream, that his safety was with Emma. According to the LDS Church's official history, Joseph received that divine direction about a week after he was forced into hiding on August 8. Various Church leaders were advising Joseph as to what was his best way to escape being captured. Bishop George Miller, who was engaged in obtaining lumber for the Temple in the Pineries of Wisconsin, urged Joseph to seek safety there. On August 16, Joseph wrote to Emma: Brother Miller again suggested to me the propriety of my accompanying him to the Pine Woods, and then he return, and bring you and the children. My mind will eternally revolt at every suggestion of that kind, more especially since the dream and vision that was manifested to me on the last night. My safety is with you, if you want to have it so. Anything more or less than this cometh of evil. My feelings and counsel I think ought to be abided. If I go to the Pine country, you shall go along with me, and the children; and if you and the children go not with me, I don't go. I do not wish to exile myself for the sake of my own life, I would rather fight it out. It is for your sakes, therefore, that I would do such a thing. (LDS History of the Church 5:104) The fact that Joseph insisted upon staying with Emma is another proof that he was not a polygamist. When Brigham Young made his journey to what is now Salt Lake City, Utah, he left his legal wife behind, and took a young plural wife, Clara Decker Young, with him. Joseph, in direct opposition to Brigham's conduct, said to Emma, "My safety is with you.... If I go to the Pine country, you shall go along with me, and the children; and if you and the children go not with me, I don't go." The two of them chose to remain together at the Homestead. On November 2,1842, Joseph said:
He could now perform his work near his secret hideaway and be near his beloved family. Joseph Published Much against PolygamyJoseph did not slacken his intense warfare against polygamy after the three hundred and eighty missionaries left Nauvoo in early September to travel throughout the United States, preaching the gospel and distributing the Affidavits and Certificates Disproving the Statements and Affidavits Contained in John C. Bennett's Letters. One way in which he continued his efforts was to publish extensive material against polygamy in the Times and Seasons, of which he was editor. As mentioned in a previous chapter, he published in the September 1 issue:
Note Joseph's assertion that "The extract is from the Book of Doctrine and Covenants, and is the only rule allowed by the church." The Prophet could not have been more clear and definite in stating his monogamous position. The LDS Church alleges that he was a polygamist at the time. If so, he was purposefully covering up, lying to camouflage his actions and mislead the Saints and the public. For a prophet to lie would have been cowardly, unrighteous, and sinful, and would have disqualified him as a righteous prophet of God. But time is vindicating Joseph. There is mounting evidence that he was making truthful statements as he systematically asserted his innocence and condemned polygamy. The Prophet's brother, Apostle William Smith, also printed that the only rule on marriage in the Church was the one found in the Doctrine and Covenants as quoted in the September 1, 1842, Times and Seasons. William printed a statement from another newspaper, the Portland American, which had referred to Bennett's charge of a "seraglio" at Nauvoo. According to William, the Portland American printed,
All the leaven of the man of sin, we despise:—so when the Portland American, "dropped the spiritual seraglio of Joe Smith at Nauvoo," he told a falsehood without any proof, or color of Proof, more than the say so, of that wretch and outcast of society, J. C. Bennett. For the rule of marriage among the Mormons, see the Times and Seasons of Oct. 1,1842. (Wasp 1 [October 8, 1842]: 2) Once more the public was directed to the section on "Marriage" in the Doctrine and Covenants. The "Marriage" Article Was Again QuotedExactly one month after Joseph republished the statement that "Inasmuch as this church of Christ has been reproached with the crime of fornication, and polygamy: we declare that we believe, that one man should have one wife," he published it again. This time he gave it greater emphasis by republishing the complete article on "Marriage," which was Section 109 of the 1835 Edition of the Doctrine and Covenants. (As stated previously, it is presently Section 111 in the RLDS Doctrine and Covenants but was omitted from the LDS Doctrine and Covenants in 1876 when Brigham Young caused Section 132, which favored polygamy, to be inserted.) A Certificate Signed by Prominent MenFollowing the "Marriage" article, Joseph published in the same issue certificates signed by leading men and women of the Church and city. The certificate signed by the gentlemen stated:
A Certificate Signed by Prominent WomenIt is significant that the certificate below was signed by some of Nauvoo' s most prominent women. It is inconceivable that so many women would knowingly lie to cover up a new secret doctrine so foreign to their natures and to the Scriptures which they revered. Those women, led by Emma Smith, bequeathed to the Church this testimony:
Joseph Published that Hagar Was Sarah's Servant, Not Abraham's WifeLDS publications printed in Utah contain numerous references to Abraham as an excuse for practicing polygamy. Members of the LDS Church still strongly defend Section 132 of their Doctrine and Covenants, which falsely attributes these words to Joseph:
An article in the Church's newspaper at Nauvoo, while Joseph was the editor, contradicts the above and gives one more evidence that Joseph did not regard Hagar as Abraham's wife, but as Abraham's wife's servant. In an article in the Times and Seasons, Hagar, who bore a son for Abraham, is referred to as Abraham's wife Sarah's servant, and not Abraham's wife. The article reported a conversation held between a Saint and a minister of another church, and contained the following:
If Joseph had been an advocate of polygamy, and was using Abraham as an example or excuse, he would not have published an article which referred to Hagar as being only a servant. The Nauvoo Presses Spread Truth about Monogamy
During this period the Prophet also published a statement in which the readers were assured that the presses of the Times and Seasons and the Wasp were publishing the truth—the subject of polygamy being a major topic in both papers. That statement was:
Joseph Published that a Man Must Not Covet His Neighbor's WifeThe LDS Church has taught for over a century that Joseph married women who were already married to other men. According to LDS authors, by the fall of 1842 Joseph was married to Mary Elizabeth Rollins, wife of Adam Lightner (see John J. Stewart, Brigham Young and His Wives: And The True Story of Plural Marriage [Salt Lake City, Utah: Mercury Publishing Company, Inc., 1961], 89), and Zina Diantha Huntington, wife of Henry B. Jacobs (ibid., 92; see also Andrew Jenson, Ed., The Historical Record 6 [May 1887]: 233; and Times and Seasons 2 [April 1, 1841]: 374). Both women were living with their husbands at that time. However, during this same time frame Joseph wrote against coveting other men's wives, when as a part of his "History of Joseph Smith" which was appearing serially in the Church paper, he republished an 1830 revelation in which it was revealed to him:
Joseph could not have taken other men's wives without violating this commandment. If he had been a polygamist in 1842, he would not have republished this 1830 revelation against coveting "thy neighbor's wife." Joseph Published Elder Winchester's Denial of PolygamyThe Times and Seasons contained a reprint of an article from the Baltimore Clipper, which reported an address by one of the Church's prominent missionaries, Elder Benjamin Winchester. It published:
Lorenzo Wasson Came to Joseph's DefenseLorenzo Wasson, who was Emma's nephew, was devoted to his Aunt Emma and Uncle Joseph. He was the son of Emma's sister, Elizabeth, and her husband, Benjamin Wasson. The Prophet baptized and confirmed Lorenzo a member of the Church on March 20, 1842, in the Mississippi River at Nauvoo (see Times and Seasons 3 [April 15, 1842]: 752–753). Lorenzo was soon ordained and sent forth as a missionary. He had lived at the Homestead, and upon learning of Dr. Bennett's slanderous attack upon Joseph, he wrote a letter to his uncle and aunt in which he offered to make an affidavit "in relation to Bennett." His letter stated:
By the time Lorenzo's letter arrived, Joseph was in hiding. On August 16, while the Prophet was hiding, he wrote Emma a letter in which he instructed her to write Lorenzo and ask him to make the affidavit which he had offered to provide. The Prophet wrote:
There is every reason to believe that Emma notified Lorenzo of Joseph's request, and that Lorenzo supplied Joseph with the "many things I can inform you of, if necessary, in relation to Bennett and his prostitutes." From the day of Lorenzo's baptism until Joseph's death, Lorenzo did all that was in his power to assist Joseph, as the following shows. In June 1843, while Joseph, Emma, and their children were visiting Lorenzo's parents, Elizabeth and Benjamin Wasson, near Dixon, Illinois, Sheriff Joseph H. Reynolds of Jackson County, Missouri, and Constable Harmon T. Wilson of Carthage, Illinois, served Joseph with a warrant and took the Prophet into custody. Joseph III recalled:
In recalling his father's return to Nauvoo, Joseph III said:
LDS history records that it was Lorenzo who drove Emma and her children back to Nauvoo. They quote Joseph's record as saying:
Joseph III remembers Lorenzo in a sadder scene. When recalling the assassination of his father, Joseph III stated:
Judging from Lorenzo's faithfulness, did he make the affidavit which Joseph requested? If so, what happened to it? No affidavit by Lorenzo was published in Joseph's lifetime. A few weeks after the Prophet made the request to Lorenzo, Joseph resigned the editorship of the Times and Seasons. Apostle John Taylor, who secretly favored the practicing of polygamy, replaced him as editor. There was an immediate and substantial decrease in the publication of materials against polygamy from then until Joseph's death. If Lorenzo made the affidavit, and if it still exists, a revealment of its contents would no doubt supply more testimony of Joseph's innocence. The above quotations from the Times and Seasons, the Wasp, and the LDS History of the Church give added evidence that while Joseph was hiding to avoid arrest in 1842, he waged a tremendous battle to uproot polygamy from the Church. He never changed his course, never deviated from his role of a monogamous husband, and gave no indication of lying or attempting to cover up a polygamous way of life. He bore faithful witness in easy-to-understand language that he was not a polygamist, and that he abhorred that doctrine and would not tolerate it in the Church. He and Emma were an exemplary couple—unified in marriage fidelity and Church doctrine. Obedient to the vision and dream that had been given him, Joseph worked closely with Emma, knowing that with her was safety. Likewise, Emma put her trust in Joseph as false polygamous accusations tried to engulf them. Emma must have found comfort in the revelation which the Lord had given to her in 1830—for with his hands upon her head, Joseph had prophetically proclaimed:
This prophecy was in part fulfilled because Joseph supported her "in the church" by never taking a plural wife. The two of them stood as one in their fight against polygamy.
[ Joseph Smith Fought Polygamy Index ]
Joseph Smith Fought Polygamy—Volume I, by Richard and Pamela Price, can be purchased at the Restoration Bookstore or from our online store. Articles on this subject continue to be published in Vision magazine, which also can be purchased at the Restoration Bookstore or online. It is planned that this additional material will be compiled into future volumes. For a general understanding of both the origins of polygamy among the Latter Day Saints and the several conspiracies to falsely implicate Joseph in polygamy, read the article on our Web site, "Joseph Smith: Innocent of Polygamy," by Richard Price. |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||