Joseph Smith Fought
Polygamy
Vision Articles
How Men Nearest
the Prophet Attached Polygamy to His Name
in Order to Justify Their Own Polygamous Crimes
By Richard and
Pamela Price |
"What a thing it is
for a man to be accused of committing adultery, and having seven
wives,
when I can only find one"—Joseph Smith (LDS
History of the Church 6:411).
[ Joseph
Smith Fought Polygamy Index ]
The LDS Church Charged Joseph with Marrying Other
Men's Wives
Preceding chapters have given documentation of Joseph's amazing
fight against the doctrine of plural marriage. The story of Seventy
Richard Hewitt's visit to Nauvoo to interview Joseph on that subject,
and Hyrum's forthright answers to Hewitt in the Times
and Seasons, is only one of many statements made by Joseph
and Hyrum.
In spite of their straightforward answers, the Prophet Joseph
Smith was, and is still, being charged with many false crimes,
one of the worst being that he asked for and married other men's
wives. As mentioned in a prior chapter, in 1887 Assistant Historian
Andrew Jenson of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints,
an editor of the Historical Record,
published the names of twenty-seven women whom he declared had
been Joseph's plural wives. Eight of the women named were married
and were living with their legal husbands on the dates they supposedly
had married Joseph. Historian Jenson's claims that Joseph married
and cohabited with the wives of other men have never been rescinded.
That is the present position of the LDS Church with headquarters
in Salt Lake City.
Jenson's charge that Joseph had married other men's wives was
not new, for Dr. John C. Bennett had published in 1842 that Joseph
had wed women who were already married and were living with their
husbands (see John C. Bennett, The History
of the Saints; or, An Expose of Joe Smith and Mormonism
[Boston: Leland & Whiting, 1842], 220–223, 256–257).
As described in Joseph
Smith Fought Polygamy, volume 1, chapter 4, it was Brigham
Young, and not Joseph, who at Nauvoo introduced the practice of
marrying other men's wives. Brigham Young made polygamy an official
doctrine in 1852.
For over one hundred years it has been suggested by different
writers and individuals that Joseph Smith was the father of certain
children bom to some of those married women. Those favoring polygamy
have kept those falsehoods alive with speculation that first one
and then another child bom to an alleged wife and her husband
was actually Joseph's son or daughter. In the families of some
of those women, stories that Joseph had fathered certain children
have been told and retold for so many years that they have become
widely believed.
It should be noted that when
Historian Jenson published his list, he was expanding on what
had been taught among the followers of Brigham Young for well
over thirty years. Jedediah M. Grant, who served in the First
Presidency under Brigham Young from 1854 to 1856, preached a sermon
on February 19, 1854, at Salt Lake City, Utah, in which he asserted:
When the family organization was revealed from heaven—the
patriarchal order of God, and Joseph began, on the right and
on the left, to add to his family, what a quaking there was
in Israel. Says one brother to another, "Joseph says all
covenants are done away, and none are binding but the new covenants;
now suppose Joseph should come and say he wanted your wife,
what would you say to that?" "I would tell him to
go to hell." This was the spirit of many in the early days
of this Church....
Did the Prophet Joseph want every man's wife he asked for?
He did not, but in that thing was the grand thread of the Priesthood
developed. (Journal of Discourses
2 [1855]: 13, 14)
This assertion by President Grant, that Joseph began to add
to his family on the right and on the left, suggests an escalation
in taking wives on the part of the Prophet. It is also evident
that Grant is accusing Joseph the Prophet of asking other men
for their wives. Grant's accusations are without foundation and
were made eleven years after Joseph had been murdered. He could
no longer defend himself against such libelous charges as he had
done prior to his death, especially during the last four years
of his life.
According to Bishop John D. Lee, who was Brigham Young's adopted
son, Young spoke of Joseph seeking other men's wives. Lee asserted,
"After the death of Joseph, Brigham Young told me that Joseph's
time on earth was short, and that the Lord allowed him privileges
that we could not have (John D. Lee, Mormonism
Unveiled: or The Life and Confessions of the Late Mormon Bishop,
John D. Lee [St. Louis, 1877], 147).
There is no evidence of even one child having been bom of any
alleged plural wife to substantiate Grant's claim that Joseph
began to add to his family on the right and the left. As for Grant's
statement that Joseph caused a quaking in Nauvoo as he added wives
to his household, it is without substantiation. It was not Joseph,
but Apostles Brigham Young, Heber C. Kimball, John Taylor, and
Parley P. Pratt, along with Joseph Noble, William Clayton, and
others who added plural wives. And, Joseph was the greatest threat
to their expanding households because he never ceased to condemn
the plural-marriage doctrine and those who were practicing it.
Joseph was frank and open, and in a public sermon expressed
a "wish" that the grand jury would reveal the names
of those women to whom it had been testified were his plural wives.
He made that wish in May 1844, a few weeks before his death, when
he preached a powerful sermon stating that he had only one wife.
He also condemned his accusers who had testified before the grand
jury that he had plural wives. The Prophet declared:
I wish the grand jury would tell me who they [the alleged
plural wives] are— whether it will be a curse or blessing
to me. I am quite tired of the fools asking me. . . . What a
thing it is for a man [Joseph] to be accused of committing adultery,
and having seven wives, when I can only find one. (LDS History
of the Church 6:411)
If Joseph had been guilty of plural marriage, he would not have
publicly wished that the members of the grand jury would reveal
their names.
After the Prophet's death many writers and reporters looked
to Young and his followers for documentation on how polygamy came
into the Church. Church history and Joseph's personal history
were rewritten, and falsehoods about Joseph and plural wives came
to be viewed as facts by millions. As the years passed the truth
became less and less known. Those untruths have been spread throughout
the world, while the testimonies by Joseph, Emma, Hyrum, and many
Saints who did not follow Young, have often been ignored.
Polygamists such as Presidents Young and Grant, by their false
testimonies, were able to convince the masses that Joseph stooped
so low as to test the apostles' loyalty to him by asking them
to give him their legal wives—the wives of their youth,
the mothers of their children.
The Eight Married Women Named by Jenson
Andrew Jenson's list of twenty-seven alleged wives of Joseph
included the names of eight married women. Nineteen were unmarried
women who bore no children at Nau-voo during Joseph's lifetime
or in the nine months directly following his death. The married
women were: (1) Lucinda Harris, (2) Zina D. Hunt-ington, (3) Prescindia
L. Huntington, (4) Ruth D. Vose, (5) Mary Elizabeth Rollins, (6)
Sylvia Sessions, (7) Elvira A. Cowles, and (8) Sarah M. Cleveland
(see Andrew Jenson, The Historical Record
6 [May 1887]: 233–234). Here are some facts about the eight
married women, and their husbands who were prominent, well-known
men in the Nauvoo community.
Lucinda Harris
Lucinda was the wife of George W. Harris. They were a married
couple at Far West, Missouri, and at Nauvoo, and were still married
and living together at the time of Joseph's death.
Zina D. Huntington
Zina was known at Nauvoo as Mrs. Henry B. Jacobs. Her maiden
name was Huntington. During the Nauvoo period, when it is said
by Historian Jenson that Joseph married her, she and Henry were
living together and she was bearing his children. They lived together
as husband and wife until after Joseph's death. After the exodus
from Nauvoo she left Henry Jacobs and became one of Brigham Young's
plural wives. Rumors have persisted for over one hundred years
among the Mormons that Joseph the Prophet was the father of one
of Zina's sons. As stated in a former chapter, DNA tests have
proven that Joseph was not the child's father, but that the father
of the child was Zina's husband, Henry B. Jacobs.
Prescindia Huntington
Prescindia was the wife of Norman Buell, and they were husband
and wife during the Church's sojourn at Far West, and during the
Church's entire stay at Nauvoo. She and Norman Buell were still
a married couple at the time of Joseph's death. She was a sister
to Zina D. Huntington Jacobs. Prescindia later left Buell and
became one of Apostle Heber C. KimbalPs plural wives. It has been
widely proclaimed that Joseph fathered one of Prescindia's sons
(see Fawn M. Brodie, No Man Knows My History:
The Life of Joseph Smith, the Mormon Prophet [New York:
Alfred A Knopf, 1963], 301–302, 307). DNA tests have determined
that Joseph was not the father of the child, but that Prescindia's
husband, Norman Buell, was the father.
Ruth Vose
Ruth was the wife of Edward Sayers. They were married before
moving to Nauvoo, and they were living together as husband and
wife at Nauvoo at the time of Joseph's assassination.
Mary Elizabeth Rollins
Mary was the wife of Adam Lightner, whom she married in 1835.
She and Adam lived together as husband and wife for fifty years—until
Adam died in 1885. They were the parents often children. Although
she was living with her husband, Adam, Mary was sealed to Brigham
Young for time on January 17,1846 (see John J. Stewart, Brigham
Young and His Wives: And The True Story of Plural Marriage
[Salt Lake City, Utah: Mercury Publishing Company, Inc., 1961],
89).
Sylvia Sessions
Sylvia was the wife of Windsor P. Lyon. They came to Nauvoo as
husband and wife and were still married at the time of Joseph's
death. She later became one of Apostle Heber C. Kimball's plural
wives.
Elvira Cowles
Elvira was the wife of Jonathan Holmes. Joseph the Prophet performed
their wedding ceremony December 1, 1842, at Nauvoo (see Lyndon
W. Cook, Nauvoo Deaths and Marriages, 1839-1845
[Orem, UT, Grandin Book Company, 1994], 102). From their wedding
day until Joseph's death they lived together as husband and wife.
Sarah M. Cleveland
Sarah was the wife of Judge John Cleveland of Quincy, Illinois,
a nonmember. Judge Cleveland and his wife were noted for their
charitable deeds. It was in their home that Emma Smith and her
four children, and Mrs. Sidney Rigdon and her children found a
sanctuary after fleeing from the state of Missouri. The Clevelands
were still a respected married couple at the time of Joseph's
death, and unlike the other women named above, Sarah, a member
of the Church, did not go west but remained with her nonmember
husband.
Throughout the years, from the publication of Bennett's book
in 1842 until the present era, the names of many more women, both
single and married, have been added to Jenson's list. The married
ladies listed by Jenson are discussed in this chapter because
it is with those women's children, and not children born of the
alleged single wives, that DNA researchers have in recent years
searched for Joseph's descendants. And why did the searchers not
go to the nineteen single women whom Jenson named as having married
Joseph? The answer is obvious. Those nineteen single women bore
no children at Nauvoo during the years Andrew Jenson asserted
they were Joseph's wives. Not only that, but to date DNA test
results have not been able to prove Joseph as being the father
of even one child of an alleged polygamous marriage between him
and a married woman.
The Testimony of Joseph III
Joseph Smith III, eldest son of the Prophet, was acquainted
with the women whom Historian Jenson alleged were his father's
wives. Joseph III knew that none of the single women named had
given birth to a child at Nauvoo during the Prophet's lifetime
and until 1846.
Elder Charles Derry, an RLDS missionary, reported a conversation
which he had with Joseph Smith III on the subject of the plural
marriage charges against Joseph Ill's father. Elder Derry wrote:
Bro. Joseph [HI] is taking me out to Colchester [Illinois] in
his wagon, the distance of thirty miles. We have some interesting
conversation. He does not believe his father ever practiced polygamy,
and he gives good reasons for it. He says there were several young
women lived at his father's house, but they were destitute of
homes. They were not his father's wives. If they had been it is
probable some evidence [pregnancies] would have been visible,
especially as we are told that polygamy was instituted to bring
forth a holy seed, and surely no means [of birth control] would
have been taken to have prevented this result. But he [Joseph
III] knows that none of these females had children until 1846,
which was nearly two years after Joseph's death. As for Eliza
Snow, it is reported that she had a child by Joseph; but he [Joseph
HI] knows that she never bore children while she was in Nauvoo,
which also was about two years after Joseph's death. The Brighamites
claim that Joseph has a son in Utah, but this is equally false.
(Journal of History 2 [April 1909]:
168-169), Charles Derry, Autobiography of
Elder Charles Derry, [Price Publishing Company, Independence,
Mo., 1997], 91)
Historian Jenson not only published a list of Joseph's alleged
wives, but he also published affidavits and statements signed
by well-known polygamists who supported the position that Joseph
was a polygamist. One such statement was by President Joseph F.
Smith, son of Hyrum Smith, who tried to explain away Joseph and
Hyrum's public statements in which they condemned polygamy. Joseph
F. Smith wrote:
"Let all the Latter-day Saints know
that Joseph Smith, the martyred Prophet, is responsible to God
and the world for this doctrine, and let every soul know that
he and his brother Hyrum did practice the doctrine in their
lifetime, and until their death, notwithstanding their seeming
denials as published in the Times and Seasons,
and which are so fervently relied upon as evidence against the
fact by a certain class of anti-polygamists. Those denials can
be explained, and have been, and while they are true in the
sense, and for the purpose for which they were designed, they
are not denials of plural or celestial marriage as taught by
Joseph and Hyrum Smith and practiced at the time by both of
them, and many others in prominent standing in the Church. These
seeming denials themselves are specific proofs of the existence
of the true coin, the counterfeit
of which they denounced. (Andrew Jenson, Historical
Record 6 [May 1887]: 219–220)
Historian Jenson added this statement:
We could produce hundreds of other testimonies of a similar
nature to these given above, were it necessary, but what we
have already given must be deemed fully sufficient to prove,
beyond a shadow of doubt, that Joseph Smith, the Prophet, did
teach and practice the principle of plural marriage in his lifetime,
(ibid., 233)
The "hundreds of other testimonies of a similar nature"
which Jenson promised could be produced have since been produced
and published. However, those testimonies are in contradiction
to those by the Prophet. They cannot erase the mountain of testimonies
left by him that assert he was a monogamist and an opponent of
plural marriage.
Section 132 Contains False Prophecy Concerning
Joseph's Children
The plural marriage document, known as Section 132 in the LDS
Doctrine and Covenants, contains a false prophecy. It is the promise
that Joseph the Prophet will be the father of numerous children,
"an hundred-fold." The words of that promise given to
Joseph are:
I will bless him [Joseph] and multiply him and give unto him
an hundred-fold in this world, of fathers and mothers, brothers
and sisters, houses and lands, wives and children...
(LDS Doctrine and Covenants 132:55; italics added).
The descendants of Joseph and Emma Hale Smith are said to now
number over two thousand. Where are the "hundred-fold"
children, the tens of thousands of offspring which were to have
been born of the plural wives whom the LDS Church have listed
as Joseph's wives? To date the LDS Church has not been able to
officially name one child of a union between Joseph and an alleged
plural wife.
Joseph the Martyr Brought Forth Scriptures that
Forbid Coveting Other Men's Wives
The coveting of another man's wife, which precedes the marrying
of another man's wife, is strictly forbidden in each of the Three
Standard Books. Joseph Smith was instrumental in bringing forth
those governing laws of the Church.
The Book of Mormon, which Joseph brought forth by the gift and
power of God, states:
Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house, thou shalt not
covet thy neighbor's wife. (Mosiah7:124)
The Inspired Version of the Holy Scriptures, a corrected version
of the King James Version made by Joseph (as well as the King
James Version, which was used by the Church during Joseph's lifetime),
contains these words:
Neither shalt thou desire thy neighbor's wife, neither shalt
thou covet thy neighbor's house ... or any thing that is thy
neighbor's. (Deuteronomy 5:21)
The Doctrine and Covenants, which was divinely given to Joseph
to be a law unto the Church in these last days, has these two
commandments:
And again, I command thee that thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's
wife; nor seek thy neighbor's life. (RLDS Doctrine and Covenants
18:3a; LDS Doctrine and Covenants 19:25)
It is very significant that in this revelation given through
Joseph, the commandment that a man should not covet his neighbor's
wife and the commandment to not seek to murder your neighbor is
presented together!
Joseph republished this scripture less than two years before
his death as he was in the process of writing and publishing serially
his autobiography, titled "History of Joseph Smith,"
in the Church's paper. He published the revelation, with the heading,
"A commandment of God and not of man
... by him who is eternal. " Included in the body
of the revelation were these words:
And again: I command thee, that thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's
wife. Nor seek thy neighbor's life. (Times
and Seasons 3 [October 15, 1842]: 944)
Surely the Prophet was setting forth his own beliefs when he
republished the commandments in 1842 that a man should not covet
his neighbor's wife or seek his neighbor's life.
Emma Explained Joseph's Belief on Polygamy
According to Apostle Edmund C. Briggs of the Reorganized Church
of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Joseph's widow, Emma Smith
Bidamon, told him in 1856 that she had heard Joseph declare that
polygamy and murder go together.
Elder Briggs was a primary witness, who was well acquainted
with Emma. No other missionary or elder from the RLDS Church had
the privilege he had. For almost a year Briggs boarded at the
Mansion House, a hotel kept by Emma and her second husband, Lewis
C. Bidamon. During those months Briggs had the opportunity to
observe Emma and her sons, Joseph III, Alexander, Frederick, and
David. At times Briggs had the privilege of having Emma share
with him Joseph's thoughts and opinions on important events in
the life of the Church just prior to his martyrdom. At the time
Briggs boarded at the Mansion House he was an elder, and only
twenty-one years of age. Another elder, twenty-five-year-old Samuel
Gurley, had accompanied him to Nauvoo. The two men went to Nauvoo
after they had been prophetically spoken to and told to go there
and meet with Joseph Smith III, who was the eldest son of the
Martyr. Briggs and Gurley were advised in the prophetic message
to "Tell him what you know and most assuredly believe"
concerning the Church (Edmund C. Briggs, Early
History of the Reorganization, 68).
Briggs and Gurley arrived at Nauvoo Friday, December 5, 1856.
A few days later Samuel Gurley returned to his home and family.
Briggs boarded at the Mansion House from December 5, 1856, until
the fall of 1857. He worked for Joseph III on the Smith farm east
of Nauvoo, and had much opportunity to get to know Emma and converse
with her about the Church. One evening Emma informed him that
her deceased husband, Joseph, had declared that the crimes of
polygamy and murder always go together.
I was very watchful all the time to gather any expression
from Sister Emma, in which she reflected any feeling concerning
the latter-day work. One evening, she said, "If anyone
will follow the instructions as laid down in the Proverbs of
Solomon and the Psalms of David, they will come out all right."
But Joseph said, "David was not raised from the dead when
the righteous came forth at the time of Christ's resurrection,
because he put Uriah to death; and the crimes of polygamy and
murder always go together." (ibid., 102)
Joseph's interpretation that King David was not among those
Saints who arose following the resurrection of our Lord Jesus
Christ agrees with the scripture. The Bible reveals concerning
that resurrection:
And the graves were opened; and the bodies of the saints which
slept, arose, who were many, and came out of the graves after
his resurrection, went into the holy city, and appeared unto
many. (Matthew 27:56–57)
King David was evidently not among those resurrected Saints
who came forth from their graves and went into Jerusalem, the
holy city, and appeared to many. Apostle Peter stated on the day
of Pentecost, which was after Christ's resurrection, that King
David had not yet ascended into the heavens. Peter declared:
Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch
David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulcher is
with us unto this day. . . . For David is not ascended into
the heavens. (Acts 2:29, 34)
Did not polygamy and murder go together in King David's day?
And did not polygamy and murder, under the title of blood atonement,
go together in Utah in the years immediately following the introduction
of the plural-marriage document?
The First Child Born of a Polygamous Union in the Church
Historian Andrew Jenson published, along with the list of Joseph's
alleged wives, a statement which gives the date of the birth of
the first child bom of plural marriage in the Church. The father
of the child was not Joseph Smith, but was Joseph Bates Noble,
who figured prominently in placing the blame for plural marriage
upon the dead Prophet. Andrew Jenson published:
Brother [Joseph] Noble also obeyed this higher law on April
5,1843, when Sarah B. Alley was sealed to him for time and all
eternity.... The first issue [first child born) of this marriage
was George Omner Noble (now an Elder in the Church), who was
born in Nauvoo Feb. 2, 1844. He is supposed to have been the
first polygamous child born in this dispensation. (Andrew Jenson,
The Historical Record 6 [May 1887]:
239)
Hazel Noble Boyack, one of Joseph Noble's granddaughters, wrote
in 1962 of the birth of the first child "born of a polygamous
union in the Church." She stated:
On April 5th, 1843, Elder Noble took as his first plural wife,
Sarah B. Alley ... of Nauvoo. A year later this good woman bore
to her husband a son, named George Omner. This little babe had
the distinction of being the first child born of a polygamous
union in the Church. (Hazel Noble Boyack, A
Nobleman in Israel, A Biographical Sketch of Joseph Bates Noble,
Pioneer To Utah In 1847 [Cheyenne, Wyoming: The Pioneer
Printing Company, 1962], 31)
Note that the date of Noble's marriage to Sarah B. Alley was
April 5, 1843. and that Sarah gave birth to George Omner Noble
on February 2, 1844. not quite ten months later. Historian Jenson's
frank statement that George Omner Noble was supposed to be the
first child in the Church bom of a polygamous union, reveals that
as of that date no child fathered by Joseph had been born of a
plural-marriage union. It also sets a date and makes it necessary
that any child born of a plural-marriage union between Joseph
and any plural wife would have had to have been bom between February
2, 1844, and March 1845, which would have been nine months after
the Prophet was slain.
Those who declare Joseph was a polygamist should begin to question
the facts when it is seen that a child was born after less than
ten months of marriage to Elder Noble and his first plural wife,
and not one child was born to the Prophet and any plural-marriage
wife. In contrast, Emma gave birth to three children at Nauvoo
in a period of four and a half years—Don Carlos in 1840,
a stillborn son in 1842, and David Hyrum in 1844 (see Scot Facer
Proctor and Maurine Jensen Proctor, The Revised
and Enhanced History of Joseph Smith By His Mother [Salt
Lake City, Utah: Bookcraft, Inc., 1996], 475,479, 486).
Summary
Joseph Smith was visited by a heavenly messenger on September
21, 1823. The Prophet recorded that the angel told him:
That God had a work for me to do, and that my name should be
had for good and evil, among all nations,
kindreds, and tongues; or that it [Joseph's name] should be both
good and evil spoken of among all
people. (Times and Seasons 3: 753;
RLDS History of the Church 1:12-13;
italics added)
When leading men and women in the LDS Church in Utah publicly
proclaimed that Joseph had married plural wives, including other
men's wives, they partially fulfilled the angelic prophecy which
declared that Joseph's name would be known for evil among all
nations, kindreds, and tongues.
For well over a century and a half, from Nauvoo days to the
present, falsehoods have been repeated by those who have sought
to make Joseph responsible for introducing polygamy into the Church.
False claims that Joseph fathered this or that child by the wife
of a certain apostle or elder were so readily accepted as truth
by Young's followers that today those falsehoods are accepted
as historical facts by millions. Meanwhile, Joseph's documented
testimonies and the accounts of his heroic fight against polygamy
have been largely ignored.
Edmund C. Briggs wrote that during the time he boarded at the
Mansion House in 1856-57 he heard Emma repeat one statement several
times. Briggs asserted:
Again, she [Emma] said several times in conversation with
me that the Utah Mormons had by their acts, since the death
of her husband, made true all the slanders and vile things charged
against the Church. (Edmund Briggs, Early
History of the Reorganization, 95)
Emma Smith understood that a conspiracy existed against Joseph
during his lifetime and after his death because of his opposition
to the doctrine of polygamy. Comparatively few individuals listened
to what she and other Saints who did not go west had to say in
defense of Joseph. The world wanted to believe that Joseph was
an immoral man. The reporters and writers who sought information
on Joseph's life found the accounts given by LDS Church leaders
and their plural wives far more sensational and more easily believed
than the assertions by Emma and others who declared that Joseph
had only one wife.
One RLDS missionary to Utah, Apostle William H. Kelly, correctly
stated in 1876:
Joseph's public record can not, in justice, be set aside in
this investigation. His private life must be held to have been
consistent with his public teachings, unless some substantial
evidence can be produced to prove that his private life and
teachings were the reverse of what he did in public.... Now
which is the most sensible, to believe that Joseph was what
he represented himself publicly, when there is no evidence to
the contrary, save the echoes of the "may bes"
and "perhaps" drawn from the bare statements of the
"private few," (Brigham and Miss E. R. Snow constitute
the principal part of "private few,") all of whom
are polygamist advocates, and who acknowledge that they lied
about it for a time.... I am firm in the belief, after hearing
all that come in the way, that Joseph Smith the Seer had but
one wife... (The Messenger Of the Reorganized
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints 2 [Salt Lake
City, Utah, August 1876]: 39; italics added).
The heavenly messenger who visited Joseph in 1823 promised him
that his name would be "had for good" also, so time
will vindicate the truth-fullness of the Prophet.
[ Joseph
Smith Fought Polygamy Index ]

|